Mayflower District Court
#in-re-sw-vrline
This is the start of #in-re-sw-vrline channel.
Richo 2024-11-27 06:31 p.m.@Sheriff of Clark County
Please send receipt here once it's served
Please send receipt here once it's served
Honoripedia 2024-11-27 06:33 p.m. 
Richo 2024-11-27 06:35 p.m.
Mr. Vrline, indicate if you're here @vv
shah 2024-11-27 07:31 p.m.
correct name is
In re Search Warrant (Vrline)
In re Search Warrant (Vrline)
Richo 2024-11-27 07:34 p.m.
I'll name it re sw vrline for channel name
vv 2024-11-27 07:38 p.m.
a
vv 2024-11-27 07:40 p.m.@Richo
Richo 2024-11-27 07:42 p.m.
Mr Vrline
vv 2024-11-27 07:43 p.m.
What is this for?
Richo 2024-11-27 07:43 p.m.
I just have a few questions but before I will swear you in
vv 2024-11-27 07:43 p.m.
Why though
vv 2024-11-27 07:43 p.m.
For what
Richo 2024-11-27 07:44 p.m.
In regards to the recently search warrant
Richo 2024-11-27 07:44 p.m.
Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Richo 2024-11-27 07:44 p.m.@vv
vv 2024-11-27 07:44 p.m.
Yes
Richo 2024-11-27 07:45 p.m.
The sealed search warrant that was issued you to yesterday or the day before, who informed you of it?
vv 2024-11-27 07:46 p.m.
Why does it matter
Richo 2024-11-27 07:46 p.m.
Mr. Vrline I just need the name
vv 2024-11-27 07:46 p.m.
What can you give me
vv 2024-11-27 07:46 p.m.
I gain nothing from telling you
vv 2024-11-27 07:47 p.m.
and lose nothing from not telling you
Richo 2024-11-27 07:47 p.m.
You're required to answer otherwise you'll be put in contempt
Richo 2024-11-27 07:48 p.m.
Again,
The sealed search warrant that was issued you to yesterday or the day before, who informed you of it?
The sealed search warrant that was issued you to yesterday or the day before, who informed you of it?
vv 2024-11-27 07:49 p.m.
i want a lawyer
vv 2024-11-27 07:50 p.m.
i saw the alert ingame @Richo
vv 2024-11-27 07:50 p.m.
so idk what u talking about
Richo 2024-11-27 07:52 p.m.
Keep in mind you're under oath, you're saying no one informed you of it?
Richo 2024-11-27 07:55 p.m.@vv
vv 2024-11-27 08:05 p.m.
My lawyer has filed a notice of appearance in filing-center, could you please add them
vv 2024-11-27 08:05 p.m.@Richo
Richo 2024-11-27 08:11 p.m.@Deleted User
This is not a criminal proceeding, you are only hear to advise and consult your client. You have been granted chat access as a privilege not a necessity, don't abuse it.
This is not a criminal proceeding, you are only hear to advise and consult your client. You have been granted chat access as a privilege not a necessity, don't abuse it.
Richo
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:14 p.m.
You are swearing in my client and there is a possibility that he purjures himself, why would it not be permissible for his attorney to speak on his behalf? Also I take it that this is a civil proceeding since it's not criminal?
Deleted UserYou are swearing in my client and there is a possibility that he purjures himself, why would it not be permissible for his attorney to speak on his behalf? Also I take it that this...
Richo 2024-11-27 08:15 p.m.
He is just answering questions, it's not a proceeding therefore your job is just to consult and advise him
vvi saw the alert ingame @Richo
Richo 2024-11-27 08:16 p.m.
Are you going to stick with this as your answer?
Richo 2024-11-27 08:16 p.m.
That no one informed you of the sealed warrant?
RichoHe is just answering questions, it's not a proceeding therefore your job is just to consult and advise him
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:21 p.m.
If he can incur criminal liability as a result of his statements (i.e., 1 M.S.C. § 1501 "Contempt of court," which you are threatening him with if he does not answer), then he has the right to be heard through legal counsel
Deleted UserIf he can incur criminal liability as a result of his statements (i.e., 1 M.S.C. § 1501 "Contempt of court," which you are threatening him with if he does not answer), then he has ...
Richo 2024-11-27 08:22 p.m.
You have advised and consulted him correct?
Richo 2024-11-27 08:24 p.m.
If you so, continue with your final answer @vv (edited)
RichoYou have advised and consulted him correct?
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:27 p.m.
It would be in the best interests of judicial economy if the Court allocated more time for my client to confer with me
Deleted UserIt would be in the best interests of judicial economy if the Court allocated more time for my client to confer with me
Richo 2024-11-27 08:27 p.m.
Sure
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:28 p.m.
Thanks
RichoThe sealed search warrant that was issued you to yesterday or the day before, who informed you of it?
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:29 p.m.
Are you implying that he has an issued SW by this question
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:29 p.m.
and if so, how (if it exists), he could have found out about it?:
Richo 2024-11-27 08:32 p.m.
The question was clarified multiple times, I just need his final answer regarding whether he plans to stick with his answer that no one informed him of a sealed warrant and he just saw it in game OR if he was informed by someone regarding his search warrant.
Richo 2024-11-27 08:39 p.m.
1. Were you informed of the sealed search warrant?
2. If so, who informed you?
This will be a yes or no to the 1st question@vv (edited)
2. If so, who informed you?
This will be a yes or no to the 1st question
Richo 2024-11-27 08:39 p.m.
That is all that needs to be answered
Richo1. Were you informed of the sealed search warrant? 2. If so, who informed you? This will be a yes or no to the 1st question @vv (edited)
Deleted User 2024-11-27 08:44 p.m.
The game provides him with a big notification in the bottom left of his screen that does not go away, not to mention this is the first time you have brought up awareness by notification. To ask if he was informed of a red notification that takes up 10% of his screen is trivial.
Your Honor is going all over the place: first, you ask who was informed; second, you bring up being notified in game; and third, you edit your question to tackle on another question.
I ask that Your Honor provide a clear, final, and unambiguous question for my client to answer; otherwise, he cannot be held in contempt. SeeUnited States v. Fleischman , 339 U.S. 349, 371 n.7 (1950) (“Certainly before one may be punished for contempt for violating a court order, the terms of such order should be clear and specific, and leave no doubt or uncertainty in the minds of those to whom it is addressed.”) (citing McFarland v. United States , 295 F. 648, 650).
Your Honor is going all over the place: first, you ask who was informed; second, you bring up being notified in game; and third, you edit your question to tackle on another question.
I ask that Your Honor provide a clear, final, and unambiguous question for my client to answer; otherwise, he cannot be held in contempt. See